Skip to main content

Gordon shoots down SAPA amendments in first public veto

News Letter Journal - Staff Photo - Create Article
Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon speaks before signing a veto of Senate File 196, which proposed amendments to the Second Amendment Protection Act, in the Governor’s Ceremonial Room in the Wyoming State Capitol on Tuesday, flanked by Wyoming law enforcement officers. Photo by Noah Zahn, Wyoming Tribune Eagle.
By
Noah Zahn with the Wyoming Tribune Eagle, via the Wyoming News Exchange

CHEYENNE — In his first-ever public veto of a bill, Gov. Mark Gordon shot down Senate File 196 on Tuesday afternoon.

He said he held a public session because he believed it is an important enough issue that the people of Wyoming care deeply about.

SF 196 would have amended the Second Amendment Protection Act (SAPA), which Gordon signed into law three years ago. SAPA requires a county prosecutor to file charges against an individual police officer if the officer violates the Second Amendment rights of a gun owner.

Proposed amendments under SF 196 would have said law enforcement could not legally aid the federal government in enforcing federal gun laws and would have allowed citizens to sue institutions responsible for violating the act through civil penalties.

Gordon said that while he supports the Second Amendment, the proposed SAPA amendments would have restricted Wyoming law enforcement’s ability to assist with a federal task force or enforce any federal laws, something he said he believes goes “too far.”

He likened the legislation to “Defund the Police” efforts across the country, and said it is not in line with the “Back the Blue” Wyoming values he grew up with.

Particularly, Gordon expressed concerns with how the bill would impact the Trump administration’s policies to enforce violations of federal human trafficking and undocumented immigration laws by not being able to cooperate with the federal government.

“Wyoming, I believe, supports the Trump administration’s efforts. We feel greatly about our law and order. I think this bill would, at best, hinder and, at worst, prevent our local police departments, sheriff ’s offices and Highway Patrol from participating in the federal task forces that address these very issues,” he said.

The bill also would have prohibited any local agency from hiring former U.S. government employees who had ever enforced any type of federal firearms regulation. This would include people like the U.S. Marshals guarding federal courthouses and National Guard members who may be staffing the gate at Camp Guernsey.

Gordon said law enforcement agencies could be fined $50,000 for hiring veterans who had that experience if he didn’t veto this legislation.

Col. Timothy Cameron, administrator of the Wyoming Highway Patrol, expressed concern with how SF 196 would have impacted his department’s ability to do its job.

“Specifically, not allowing us to participate in state federal task forces, limiting or eliminating our ability to participate with (the) Bureau of Indian Affairs on our reservations, and finally, our ability to hire anyone after July 1 that participated in the enforcement of federal gun laws,” Cameron said.

Additionally, critics of the bill said it would have made it more difficult for local and state law enforcement to aid in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations.

Park County Sheriff Darrell Steward expanded on Cameron’s concerns about collaboration with the federal government.

“I see several possible pitfalls of working with our federal partners when we need those types of resources available for the crimes we’re working on,” he said. “I’ve actually experienced a couple of cases in the last couple of years that we relied heavily on the FBI to assist us. And with their federal enforcement, we were able to get these cases charged through the federal government, where we could not have done it through state government.”

Gordon provided an example of how the amendments may clash with federal law.

He said that someone convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence cannot possess a firearm, but only under federal law. No such state law exists, meaning law enforcement would be criminally and civilly liable if they removed a firearm from someone convicted.

“The 68th Legislature made a point to make the Second Amendment a political litmus test,” Gordon said. “We’ve had Second Amendment bills in every legislative session for a number of years. The Legislature itself (this year) killed nine Second Amendment bills on their own. They did pass two pieces of legislation, and, as you know, I’ve had problems with the two that came through.”

In addition to SF 196, Gordon was also referencing House Bill 172, which repealed gun-free zones in state-run buildings, public schools and public meeting spaces. Gordon vetoed a similar bill last year.

Although Gordon said SF 196 “crossed the line,” he let HB 172 go into law without his signature.

“(SF 196) crossed the line for the reasons I said, this impedes people’s ability to do their jobs. You’ll remember a year ago (when I vetoed the gun-free zones bill), I had said, ‘Give us time. We’ll work the policy.’” Gordon said the original SAPA he signed into law in 2022 still included many protections under the amendments in SF 196 and added that the law has not been used in the past three years.

SF 196 was supported by 29 of 31 members of the Senate and 53 of 62 representatives in the House. The House and Senate can no longer override the veto, as March 6 was the final day of the session.

When the session ended, House and Senate leaders published a news release supporting the legislation.

“Both the House and the Senate are committed to adopting SF 196 exactly as passed this year,” the release reads. “If the Governor sees fit to veto SF 196, as is his prerogative, then the Legislature will take this issue up immediately as we convene for the 2026 session and send it to the Governor first.” Following his veto, the governor issued a statement about his decision.

“The 68th Legislature showed again its penchant to throw reason out the window, to forget practicality, and to ignore common sense when it comes to any piece of legislation with the words ‘Second Amendment’ attached to it,” he wrote.

Other actions

Gordon also signed nine bills Tuesday, including legislation banning sanctuary cities in Wyoming, prohibiting the use of private funds for elections and a prohibition on ranked-choice voting.

He also exercised his line-item veto authority on Senate File 169, “Strategic investments and projects account-repeal.” He left in place $10 million for the siting, design, construction and operation of a new State Shooting Complex. However, he questioned the inclusion of the shooting complex in a bill outside the supplemental budget process, while the Legislature chose not to fund other capital construction projects, including a new veterans home, according to a press release from the governor’s office.

In his letter vetoing Sections 1, 2, and 3 of SF 169, Gordon wrote that he has always supported simplicity in budgeting, but the repeal of the Strategic Investments and Projects Account removes the ability of the governor to use investment income that should be available to any governor in recommending a budget.

“The effort seems counterintuitive and parochial, serving only the narrow focus of withholding revenue from the Executive Branch budgeting process while preserving it exclusively for the legislature’s priorities,” Gordon wrote. “Wyoming is required to balance its budget with expenditures not exceeding income. That effort has always been a joint effort. Artificially constraining income to one branch breaks with that practice and will not necessarily result in a cleaner or a leaner budget.”

The governor also vetoed Section 4 in the bill, which would have terminated the Wyoming State Penitentiary Account, a sub-account of the SIPA. The preservation of the account will enable the Department of Corrections to fund integrated security improvements, according to the release.

This story was published on March 19, 2025.

--- Online Subscribers: Please click here to log in to read this story and access all content.

Not an Online Subscriber? Click here for a one-week subscription for only $1!.